🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils could only create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.