🔗 Share this article

This is a glowing article in a magazine that Trump has consistently praised – with one exception. The magazine's cover photo, Trump declared, ""could be the worst ever".

Time magazine's paean to Donald Trump's part in brokering a ceasefire in Gaza, headlining its early November edition, was paired with a photo of the president shot from a low angle and with the sun positioned behind him.

The result, Trump claims, is ""extremely poor".

"Time Magazine wrote a relatively good story about me, but the picture may be the most awful ever", he shared on his social media platform.

“They removed my hair, and then had something floating on top of my head that resembled a hovering tiara, but an remarkably little one. Quite bizarre! I always disliked taking pictures from underneath angles, but this is a extremely poor picture, and should be criticized. What is their intention, and why?”

The president has expressed obvious his ambition to appear on Time’s cover and achieved this four times last year. This fixation has extended to the president's resorts – previously, the editors demanded to remove mocked up covers shown in some of his properties.

The latest edition’s photo was shot by a photographer for a news agency at the White House on the fifth of October.

The perspective did no favours for the president's jawline and throat – an opening that California governor Newsom took advantage of, with the governor's office posting a modified photo with the offending area pixelated.

{The Israeli captives detained in Gaza have been liberated under the initial stage of Donald Trump's peace plan, in exchange for a Palestinian prisoner release. This agreement may become a major success of his next term, and it could mark a pivotal moment for that part of the world.

Meanwhile, a defence of Trump's image has come from unusual quarters: the director of information at Moscow's diplomatic office came forward to criticise the "damaging" picture decision.

"It’s astonishing: a image exposes those who chose it than about the person in it. Only disturbed individuals, people obsessed with malice and animosity –maybe even degenerates – could have picked this picture", Maria Zakharova shared on her social channel.

"And given the complimentary photos of President Biden that the same publication featured on the front, notwithstanding his health issues, the situation is self-revealing for the magazine", she added.

The response to the president's inquiries – what did the editors intend, and why? – could be related to innovatively depicting a sense of power says Carly Earl, a media professional.

"The actual photo itself technically is good," she notes. "They selected this photo because they wanted trump to look impressive. Staring up at someone gives a sense of their importance and the president's visage actually looks reflective and almost a bit ethereal. It's rare you see images of the president in such a peaceful state – the image has a softness to it."

The president's hair looks erased because the sunlight behind him has bleached that section of the image, creating a halo effect, she says. Even though the article's title marries well with the president's look in the image, "one cannot constantly gratify the person photographed."

"No one likes being shot from underneath, and even if all of the artistic aspects of the image are very strong, the visual appeal are not flattering."

The publication reached out to the periodical for feedback.